Barrack, Rodos & Bacine Files Securities Law Class Action Lawsuit Against Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.

Barrack, Rodos & Bacine Files Securities Law Class Action Lawsuit Against Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc.

PHILADELPHIA, Jan. 21, 2014 /PRNewswire/ — Barrack, Rodos & Bacine announces that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Utah, Freedman v. Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-00033-PMW, on behalf of purchasers of common stock of Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. (NYSE: NUS) (“Nu Skin” or the “Company”) during the period from July 10, 2013 through and including January 14, 2014 (the “Class Period”).rnrnNu Skin is a global direct selling company with operations in 53 markets worldwide. The Company purports to develop and distribute premium quality anti-aging personal care products and nutritional supplements under its Nu Skin and Pharmanex brands. The Company’s global operations generated more than $2.17 billion in revenue during 2012.rnrnThe complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants issued a series of false and misleading statements concerning the Company’s business practices and growth prospects, particularly with respect to its Mainland China operations, upon which the Company has become very dependent for a very significant amount of its revenue and growth. Sales in Mainland China accounted for nearly one third of the Company’s total revenue in the first nine months of 2013. Further, the complaint alleges that while the Company issued public statements discussing its positive results and increased guidance, it failed to disclose what are alleged to be fraudulent sales practices and non-compliance with laws and regulations in China, or their potential impact on the Company. Then, in January 2014, two Chinese agencies announced that they are probing the Company’s marketing and business practices in China and that it was suspected the Company was operating as an illegal pyramid scheme. These revelations had an immediate impact on the Company’s stock price, causing shares of Nu Skin’s stock, which had risen from less than $70 per share to a high of $140.50 per share during the Class Period, to tumble over 44% in the two days of trading after these announcements. Nu Skin stock closed the trading day on January 17, 2014 at less than $80 per share. rnrnPlaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of common stock of Nu Skin during the Class Period. The plaintiff is represented by the Philadelphia-based firm of Barrack, Rodos & Bacine and by the Salt Lake City-based firm of Karrenberg & Anderson, both of which have significant experience in prosecuting class actions on behalf of investors in cases involving financial and corporate fraud.rnrnIf you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than March 22, 2014. To discuss your rights regarding the appointment of lead plaintiff and for additional information about your interest in this class action, please contact plaintiff’s counsel, Barrack, Rodos & Bacine, at the following toll-free number: 877-386-3304, or via e-mail to Jeffrey W. Golan (jgolan@barrack.com) or Julie B. Palley (jpalley@barrack.com). A copy of the complaint is available from the Court or from Barrack, Rodos & Bacine. rnwww.barrack.comrnrnSOURCE Barrack, Rodos & BacinernrnrnRELATED LINKSrnhttp://www.barrack.com

2014 Best Coffee Grinder – Coffee Grinder Reviews Released by BestConsumerReviews.com

2014 Best Coffee Grinder – Coffee Grinder Reviews Released by BestConsumerReviews.com

The editors at BestConsumerReviews.com release their reviews of the top rated coffee grinders in 2014. The professional staff at BestConsumerReviews.com outlines what consumers are in search of when in the market to purchase the best coffee grinder.rnnnPhiladelphia, PA (PRWEB) January 19, 2014nnThe consumer-based product reviews company, BestConsumerReviews.com, publicized the release of their 2014 coffee grinder reviews. The editorial staff at BestConsumerReviews.com rates coffee grinders on a variety of aspects that are important to customers including value, quality and durability. To read the full reviews and to understand how the top coffee grinders compare to each other, please visit BestConsumerReviews.com online at:nnrnnnhttp://www.bestconsumerreviews.com/coffee-grinder-reviews/nnrnnnVince Black, the Editorial Director for BestConsumerReviews.com, stated, “For coffee drinkers, a coffee grinder is essential for the fresh coffee taste. It is a purchase that requires a good amount of research before deciding which one to buy. The team at BestConsumerReviews.com can relate because it is powered by coffee. The coffee grinders that are ranked all share high-quality construction qualities that will make them last throughout the years.”nnrnnnThe top coffee grinder went to the KRUPS 203-42 Electric Spice and Coffee Grinder after a thorough review process. Quite a few consumers favor the KRUPS 203-42 Electric Spice and Coffee Grinder due to its quality build and the ability to grind not only coffee beans but other items like spices. The Krupps Coffee Grinder has a great design and would fit into any kitchen. For an entire review of the leading coffee grinders and to compare them side by side, please visit BestConsumerReviews.com online at:nnrnnn2014 Coffee Grinder Reviews – BestConsumerReviews.comnnrnnnAbout BestConsumerReviews.com rnnnBestConsumerReviews.com is a reviews website centered on providing the most current information to consumers. The analysts at BestConsumerReviews.com rank each product based on a group of features that are important to the consumer purchasing the product or service. BestConsumerReviews.com provides an experience to the consumer which makes it simple to determine which product is the best choice according to what is important to them. There are hundreds of independent reviews of consumer-based products and services available on BestConsumerReviews.com.